According to Al-Masdar News, in addition to the two planes already delivered, Syria expects to receive another eight aircraft in the near future. The planes are said to have been retrofitted with new equipment “to enhance their capabilities and improve their combat efficiency,” including improved avionics, featuring both GPS and GLONASS, and a new heads-up display. The deliveries are said to be part of a defense order signed back in 2009.
Commenting on the news, Svobodnaya Pressa columnist Anton Mardasov wrote that “at first glance, there’s nothing unusual about this news: weakened by years of war, the park of the Syrian Air Force is in need of urgent replenishment. Just in the past month the effort against the Islamists has resulted in the loss of two of its aircraft.”
“But what if the logic behind this step lies in more than just the replenishment of the Syrian Air Force?” the journalist asked. “If one places this news into the overall context of what is happening in Syria, one begins to get the impression that the Russian government, in handing these bombers over to Syria, is making a clever move.”
“Judge for yourselves,” Mardasov suggested: “On July 26, after a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, US Secretary of State John Kerry spoke of progress in talks on Syria. In particular, [he talked] of coordination in airstrikes against Daesh (ISIL/ISIS) and the Al-Nusra Front, and a simultaneous halt to the bombing of the ‘moderate’ insurgents. However, these ‘moderates’ have not left the front lines and continue to fight Assad’s army. If Moscow is on Damascus’s side, it has an obligation to help it repel these attacks. It seems that pressure from Washington has forced us to step aside, but what if this is just a formality?”
The heart of the issue, according to the journalist, is that it matters little if the Russian Aerospace Defense Forces are the ones bombing the terrorists, or if it’s the Syrian Air Force doing it. “What difference does it make if it’s Russian or Syrian pilots at the controls of the Su-24s? The main thing is that the bombs drop on their designated targets. If the Syrians begin using the upgraded bombers, will it be difficult to figure out who blew up another camp of ‘moderate’ rebels – Russian or Syrian air power? Damascus, unlike Moscow, is not conducting any negotiations with Washington, and consistently calls all armed opposition in Syria ‘terrorists’.”
Asked to comment on the delivery of the Su-24M2s, military expert Yakov Kedmi, a former high ranking official in the Israeli intelligence services, told Svobodnaya Pressa that the delivery was planned long ago. “After Russia actively got involved in the Syrian conflict, Moscow also simultaneously began activities to restore the Syrian Armed Forces, the Syrian Air Force first and foremost. This included the modernization of the Su-24MK, and their equipment with the SVP-24 special computing subsystem designed to increase bombing precision many times, along with the training of pilots and maintenance personnel.”
The decision on the number of planes, according to Kedmi, has to do with the number that the Syrian Air Force is currently capable of absorbing. “Factually,” the expert noted, “the Syrian Air Force significantly increased its involvement in the fighting following the withdrawal of Russian aircraft from the Hmeymim Airbase. Syrian pilots began carrying out up to 30 sorties a day, which is a strong showing for this country’s Air Force.”
“Naturally, closer cooperation between aircraft and armored vehicles, artillery and infantry requires that pilots speak the local language, and are acquainted with the tactics of national units. [Therefore], as I understand it, Russia will continue to supply the Syrian army with arms – both new and upgraded. And this will continue regardless of negotiations with the United States,” Kedmi concluded.For his part, Semyon Bagdasarov, the director of the Center for the Study of the Middle East and Central Asia, could not rule out Mardasov’s suggestion that the delivery of the aircraft was aimed at strengthening the Syrian military’s potential, including against the so-called ‘moderate’ jihadists.
“It’s possible that the delivery of the Su-24M2s really is connected with an attempt to circumvent agreements with the United States, even if unlike the Americans, the French, and the British, both Damascus and Moscow have every right to bomb every group they consider terrorists on Syrian territory. Yes, Washington may not like this, but Moscow too isn’t exactly thrilled that US Special Forces are deployed in Syrian Kurdistan, and that the head of the US Army’s Central Command General Joseph Votel and special envoy to the US president Brett McGurk go there whenever they feel like it.”
Finally, for his part, Sergei Balmasov, an expert at the Moscow-based Institute for Middle East Studies, emphasized that Moscow must be careful not to completely ignore Washington’s interests in Syria.”It remains necessary, in one way or another, to coordinate our activity with the Americans, so as not to overstep a ‘red line’ of sorts. Washington has the capabilities to do us a great deal of harm across the former Soviet Union, as in Ukraine, as well as in Syria. They can increase their deliveries of more advanced weapons systems to the Syrian rebels,” for example.
“Additionally,” Balmasov noted, “it is important to preserve the possibility of political dialogue with the US, and the Syrian conflict is one of the few topics we can talk about.” Ultimately, the analyst noted, fighting against the so-called moderate Syrian opposition “is necessary, but we are forced to try to walk around the lines drawn by Washington.” Otherwise, the US may work even harder to step up political and military pressure against both Damascus and Moscow.